Comments on: The Rules. http://www.ifp.org/resources/the-rules/ Independent Filmmaker Project Thu, 05 Sep 2013 05:13:47 +0000 hourly 1 By: Caspar Newbolthttp://www.ifp.org/resources/the-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-2493 Caspar Newbolt Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:24:36 +0000 http://www.ifp.org/?p=11542#comment-2493 nice. yeah, ‘fight club’ is particularly good in that way simply because the name and posters and whatnot gave you no idea about what you were in store for.

as for the film at the party, i’ve been wracking my brains to remember for a while now, as i wanted to mention it in the article. it was one of the big films of my life around 2006 / 2007, which i was no doubt telling everyone to see at the time … just wish i could remember what it was. obviously i remember the fact that he was using ‘rotten tomatoes’ against me more than why. god i even remember the guy’s name, just not the damn movie. if it comes to me i’ll let you know …

wait, it might have been michael mann’s ‘miami vice’ feature length (which i think is under-rated), but again i can’t be sure.

]]> By: Lukehttp://www.ifp.org/resources/the-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-2473 Luke Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:50:32 +0000 http://www.ifp.org/?p=11542#comment-2473 I actually re-watched Fight Club a few nights ago and was thinking about how glad I didn’t read or hear anything about the movie before I watched it for the first time, because the experience is pretty powerful when taken “purely,” as you say.

Just out of curiosity what movie were you arguing was good against the Rotten Tomatoes guy? Was it Saw?

]]> By: The Rules for Watching Movies « flux-rad.comhttp://www.ifp.org/resources/the-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-2462 The Rules for Watching Movies « flux-rad.com Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:01:41 +0000 http://www.ifp.org/?p=11542#comment-2462 [...] Read the rest at IFP. [...]

]]>