<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IFP &#187; Editing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ifp.org/resources/category/editing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ifp.org</link>
	<description>Independent Filmmaker Project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:19:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>8 Things NOT To Do in Post on Your First Feature</title>
		<link>http://www.ifp.org/resources/8-things-not-to-do-in-post-on-your-first-feature/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ifp.org/resources/8-things-not-to-do-in-post-on-your-first-feature/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 21:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oakley Anderson Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Film Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post Production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edit structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first-time feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IFP Labs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ifp.org/?p=15430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There we were, my Producer Alex Reinhard and I, straight off the plane from California to LGA.  Pulling up in front of us was the M60 bus that would take us to the fabled NY subway.  Three M60’s later, we were finally able to board amidst the pushing and shoving &#8230;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There we were, my Producer Alex Reinhard and I, straight off the plane from California to LGA.  Pulling up in front of us was the M60 bus that would take us to the fabled NY subway.  Three M60’s later, we were finally able to board amidst the pushing and shoving of the more bus savvy New Yorkers we were up against.  <em>Oh, NYC, such excitement! </em></p>
<p>The first time I ever came to this city was a few years ago, when I filmed interviews in New Paltz for my first feature documentary.  On that trip, I had just turned 24 and was driving a Rent-a-Wreck down a NY highway when…BAM!  The hood flew straight up into the windshield.  By comparison, this trip was off to a much better start.  Now I was in New York with the same <a href="http://www.lastwildmountain.com" target="_blank">nearly finished documentary</a> in time for Week 1 of the <strong>2012 IFP Independent Documentary Lab</strong>.</p>
<p>After a week of workshops with 9 other amazing projects, I came out with this list of what you should avoid during Post-Production.  I know, because I did them all!  Don’t do what I did, do what I say.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ifp.org/resources/8-things-not-to-do-in-post-on-your-first-feature/brave-new-wild-recording-session-with-musicians/" rel="attachment wp-att-15481"><img class="size-full wp-image-15481 aligncenter" src="http://www.ifp.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Brave-New-Wild-Recording-Session-with-musicians.jpg?9d7bd4" alt="The one thing we splurged on in Post: live musicians for our score!  You decide what is most important to your project..." width="458" height="305" /></a></p>
<h3><strong>1.  Don’t edit the film yourself, you crazy clod.</strong></h3>
<p>Documentary is the medium that involves the most frightening ratio of material shot to material used, so if you are mad enough to do it by yourself, it can take years, and you can lose your way.  For example, I waded through 40 interviews with 1960s/1970s rock climbers conducted over 30 days while living out of a 1976 VW van with my other 3 crew from LA to New York (that would be the 2<sup>nd</sup> time I made it to this city).   I thought I was crazy, until of course I met our friends &amp; labmates <em>For Thousands of Miles</em> – for their intriguing genre-bending doc, they spent 3 months on a van filming one man on a bicycle!</p>
<p>The bottom line is that, after awhile, it becomes incredibly hard to see the forest for the trees.  If you feel you HAVE to edit it yourself, or if you can’t afford to do otherwise, I’d suggest what we’re doing: edit yourself, and then hand it over to a professional with fresh eyes to get you the last of the way.</p>
<h3><strong>2.  If you must edit it yourself, don’t skip vital information in lieu of <em>Memento</em>-styled twists and turns.</strong></h3>
<p>“You’ve spent 800 hours with your subject matter.  Your audience only has 90 minutes.  They’ll never know the nuanced story you know,” said Cindy Lee (Editor <em>Hot Coffee</em>) during the editing session with the striking Bronx-set Lab doc <em>Lucky</em>.  Cindy was speaking generally, but I took it specifically for our film.  Holy heck, I thought, that’s the bottom line – take out the extraneous attempts to encompass the <em>meaning of life</em>, and look at only your 90-minute slot.  A little simplification can go a long way.</p>
<h3><strong>3. Don’t forget what you learned in High School English.</strong></h3>
<p>Speaking of coherency, remember when you had to write an essay about “Julius Cesar” and your teacher insisted you write a thesis sentence at the end of your first paragraph?  Well that can be incredibly useful in a film, too.  If you start off clearly articulating a thesis, you can save yourself the painful revisions and cuts where you completely throw out segments of your story after realizing, in an editing session with Penelope Falk (Editor <em>Joan Rivers: Piece of Work</em>) on Day 2 of the Doc Lab, that one part of your film really has nothing to do with anything else.  This isn’t to say that you can’t make a great doc that does not follow conventional structure, but if you start off with a clear thesis, you will never unintentionally go astray.</p>
<h3><strong>4.  Don’t fall off the face of the planet while you edit.</strong></h3>
<p>Because believe me its going to take you longer than you think, and you can’t afford to lose all the work you’ve done connecting with your audience through social media channels.  (And stop rolling your eyes when people say ‘social media’).  So send out your newsletters.  Remind your Kickstarter backers that you haven’t taken their donations and run off the to Cayman Islands.  Update your blog.  You don’t need to post about your <span style="text-decoration: underline;">editing process</span> because, frankly, no one cares.  In fact, it may be better not to post about your film at all!  As Gary Hustwit of <em>Helvetica</em> said when he came to speak to the Labs, “the idea of your film is often much better than the film itself.”  It’s better to find interesting stuff loosely related to your subject matter, like the national progress of East Timor if you’re spy-thriller-love-story Lab doc<em> Alias Ruby Blade</em> or quirky pre-Beat poetry if you’re <em>Big Joy: The Adventures of James Broughton.</em>  That way your supporters will be engaged, your friends will stop asking you if you’re still working on “that film” and your mother will know you’re alive.</p>
<h3><strong>5. Don’t wait until the very end to get all your formal releases and/or a Lawyer</strong>.</h3>
<p>Sounds obvious, but sometimes you can’t afford to license material until you know for sure you will be using it (like at Picture Lock, or beyond if you&#8217;re waiting to get into a Festival to get Fest rights).  Frustratingly, the licensor may change his/her mind, or may up the rates you thought you were going to get.  One suggestion in the Labs was to get a written agreement about the rate and/or conditions of your license beforehand as an assurance if you can’t license from the beginning.  And as entertainment law specialist Roz Lichter pointed out in the Labs legal session, don’t forget about crew memos too!  (Crew memos?  You mean I have to have a signed agreement with my cousin that by holding the boom mic he does not own any of my movie? Yes.)</p>
<p>Of course, don’t even start to edit without releases for your interview subjects. People change their minds and sometimes catastrophe strikes.  In my film, one of our subjects died in a tragic climbing accident a month after our interview; it was difficult enough to figure out what this meant for the film without having to worry about rights.  Be straightforward about your legal matters, and save yourself complications later.</p>
<h3><strong>6. Don’t sweat the small stuff.</strong></h3>
<p>One of the Lab leaders, Susan Motamed (Producer, <em>Enron: Smartest Guys in the Room</em>) said something like this, “Don’t spend money on something you can’t afford just because someone else said you had to.”  Especially when you&#8217;re making your first professional feature, it&#8217;s hard to tell what you really need to be competitive.  The truth is that each film needs different things.  Consider the post costs of eccentric Lab doc <em>Our Nixon</em> which is entirely archival (entirely!) featuring the first EVER transfers of 8mm reels confiscated from White House aides during Watergate.  Compare the needs of their telecine to the needs of the gripping Lab doc <em>These Birds Walk</em> which has  no archives but was exquisitely shot on multiple trips to Pakistan. Both may spend the same amount in Post, but on completely different things.</p>
<p>On day 2, we took a field trip to <a title="Final Frame Post" href="http://www.finalframepost.com/" target="_blank">Final Frame Post</a>, which was kind of like taking a group of Tiny Tims window-shopping for Christmas Dinner.  The talented people at Final Frame showed us samples of current docs they were working on (drool) but also pointed out that some projects could succeed having a freelancer do color correction in a living room and exporting uncompressed.  No two projects require the same treatments, and if you don’t need something you can’t afford to get, don’t go broke for it.</p>
<h3><strong>7.  Don’t obsess about how the people in the film will like the movie.</strong></h3>
<p>Ethics of representing your subjects is a salient topic in documentary.  Lab doc <em>Where God Likes to Be</em> had to first win over the elders on the Montana Blackfeet Reservation for their story.  Focusing on something completely different than previous docs about Reservation life, 3 young Blackfeet kids deciding their future, won over the Elders and comprised the core of their film.</p>
<p>There are other instances however when personal relationships work against the needs of the film.  In particular, you will eventually have to let go of something (or someone) for the good of the story.  Just remember that at the end of the day, the people who participated in your film will be prouder to have had a small role in a great film rather than a big roll in a film that wasn’t as compelling.  And, if you can’t bear to cut someone’s interesting tidbit, as Lab leader Maureen Ryan (Producer, <em>Man on Wire</em>) mentioned – though not a tritely as I am saying in this context &#8212; there’s always DVD bonus features!</p>
<h3><strong>8.  Don’t forget to look around.   </strong></h3>
<p>Between your editing cave, obsessive devotion to your film, and “film, film, film” tweets, you may start to feel isolated from the other creative people in the world.  Of everything we were exposed to in the first week of the doc labs, one of the best aspects was sharing experiences with the 9 other promising films at the Lab.  As IFP Senior Programmer Milton Tabbot mentioned on the first day, this year’s IFP Lab featured one of the most diverse collections of docs, and maybe this was why there was much interest and fraternity between our teams.  On the networking night with the general membership of IFP, the doc teams could be found excitedly swapping stories over beers one room over from the networking fray.  From braving Border Town outlaws in  <em>Purgatorio</em> or poetically preserving the ritualized traditions of the remote Haida in <em>Survival Prayer,</em> each of us had taken a long, bold journey with our films.  You could put together the most comprehensive &#8220;What-Not-To-Do&#8221; list from us, and somehow we had still made the films we’d set out to make.  So don’t forget to look up from your laptop once in a while to see what other people like you are doing, because it can be greatly rewarding.  And when you find them, consider buying the first round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ifp.org/resources/8-things-not-to-do-in-post-on-your-first-feature/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>12 Key Traits of the &#8220;Indie-Friendly&#8221; Director</title>
		<link>http://www.ifp.org/resources/12-key-traits-of-the-indie-friendly-director/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ifp.org/resources/12-key-traits-of-the-indie-friendly-director/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 19:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mynette Louie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audience Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budgeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cinematography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Film Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post Production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ifp.org/?p=15156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="wp-caption-text">Video Village, Indie-Style</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>Not every director is suited for low-budget indie filmmaking, and that&#8217;s OK if you&#8217;re Terrence Malick or David Fincher. But chances are, you&#8217;re not&#8230;or not yet, anyway. I get a fair number of calls from biggish directors and producers who are having trouble raising money for their &#8230;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_15170" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 610px"><img class="size-full wp-image-15170" src="http://www.ifp.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/04.jpg?9d7bd4" alt="" width="600" height="400" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Video Village, Indie-Style</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Not every director is suited for low-budget indie filmmaking, and that&#8217;s OK if you&#8217;re Terrence Malick or David Fincher. But chances are, you&#8217;re not&#8230;or not yet, anyway. I get a fair number of calls from biggish directors and producers who are having trouble raising money for their films and want to explore how to make them on the super-cheap. I&#8217;ve entertained some of these requests, collecting funny anecdotes along the way, like the director who wanted to fly in stars from another country and rent large trailers for them, but forego unions and production insurance. Or the producer who wanted to cast an actor whose agent demanded $12,000 worth of perks, when our entire costume budget was just $4,000. As much as I want to work with these namey folks, I usually end up politely declining because I know that it will be difficult for them (and for me, especially) to make a movie on a fraction of the budgets to which they&#8217;re accustomed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve now worked with twenty different directors on mostly low-budget indie projects&#8211;some of whom I&#8217;d like to work with again and again; others, never again. By now, I can tell when a director is lying, even if he or she doesn&#8217;t realize it&#8211;&#8221;it&#8217;ll be 70% handheld,&#8221; &#8220;we can just run and gun it with a skeleton crew,&#8221; &#8220;all I need is an extra half day for second unit stuff.&#8221; Yeah, right. Most of the director foibles I&#8217;ve dealt with are due to inexperience and will likely resolve themselves with time. But sometimes, I wonder if some people just weren&#8217;t meant to direct&#8211;at least not low-budget indies.</p>
<p>So what are the traits that I think make a director &#8220;indie-friendly&#8221; (and more generally, &#8220;producer-friendly&#8221;)? Besides the usual traits that all directors should have&#8211;passion, confidence, focus, a high E.Q., a collaborative spirit, a sense of humor, the ability to command respect, an openness to feedback balanced with decisiveness&#8211;here are the traits that are especially important when working with limited resources:</p>
<p><strong>1. Fast Writer</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong> I&#8217;ve worked mostly with writer-directors, which offers an efficiency that&#8217;s often missing when the writer and director are different people. So much rewriting is done not just during development and prep, but also during production. Some of my directors have had to rewrite whole scenes minutes before shooting them. There is probably a lot more production-directed rewriting in the indie world since we are constantly trying to figure out how to stretch a budget. Development periods are also a lot shorter for us because they have to be&#8211;typically, no one gets paid during development; we only get paid if we&#8217;re in production. As such, it&#8217;s nice to work with speedy writers who can discuss, digest, and incorporate notes quickly to produce a shoppable draft.</p>
<p><strong>2. Adaptive</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>Anything can happen in filmmaking, especially if you have limited resources&#8211;extras stand you up, location owners change their minds at the last minute, the G&amp;E truck takes a wrong turn and shows up 2 hours late. So it&#8217;s critical for a director to be able to adapt to these exigent circumstances and figure out how to make lemonade from lemons. I&#8217;ve worked with directors who refused to shoot because a featured extra didn&#8217;t show up. Even after I&#8217;d come up with workable solutions, the directors still resisted, insisting that the entire film would be ruined without this extra. Really? You have a set, a camera, equipment, and a cast and crew of 50 at your fingertips, and you&#8217;re just going to cross your arms and pout? You&#8217;re a creative person&#8230;create something! If it ends up sucking, then reshoot it. But for now, use what&#8217;s right in front of you and try to make something. (By the way, I&#8217;ve never had to reshoot any scene that called for an unexpected last-minute fix like this.) Being adaptive and thinking on your feet also helps when there are happy accidents. Filmmaking is organic and unpredictable, and when the right mix of elements strikes on set, a good director will know how to capitalize on it.</p>
<p><strong>3. Editing Experience</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>It is so valuable for a director to have editing experience because she or he will know on set what&#8217;s important and what&#8217;s not, what can be sacrificed and what can&#8217;t. Indie films are scheduled so tightly that it&#8217;s often very tough to make the day. All of my feature productions have been between 19 and 24 days, shooting between 4-7 pages and 15-35 setups per day. Sometimes, shots and even scenes have to be cut on the day of shooting. A director who also edits will have a much better sense of which shots are expendable, and how to make up for losing them.</p>
<p><strong>4. Ability to Visualize</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>This seems obvious, doesn&#8217;t it? But you&#8217;d be surprised how many directors can&#8217;t do this. Many indie directors I&#8217;ve encountered come from writing or theater backgrounds&#8211;they can write great dialogue and work well with actors, but they have no idea how to compose a frame. Yes, this is what cinematographers are for, but it&#8217;s much more efficient when a director can actually visualize what shots will look like before crew and cast go through the trouble of setting them up.</p>
<p><strong>5. Doesn&#8217;t Sweat the Small Stuff</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>This is probably the most controversial trait on the list. Artists are, by their nature, perfectionists&#8211;and they should be!  However, the reality is that perfection is tough to achieve on a small budget. Of course, we should always work very hard to achieve it, but the obsession over minor details&#8211;like the way a curtain drapes over a windowsill in the background&#8211;should not compromise more important things like the actors&#8217; performances or the entire shooting schedule. Except, of course, if you&#8217;re making an art film in which the position of curtains is paramount. But if you&#8217;re making a traditional narrative film where the writing, acting, and storytelling are the main events, then those are the things you should focus on. A production&#8217;s budget and schedule are a zero-sum game. It&#8217;s rare to get everything you want; it&#8217;s usually very give-and-take. So it&#8217;s important for directors to choose their battles wisely.</p>
<p><strong>6. Highly Prepared</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>One of my favorite first assistant directors, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1189187/" target="_blank">Nicolas D. Harvard</a>, has a great motto: &#8220;Fix it in prep.&#8221; Indie films benefit immensely from directors who are incredibly diligent about doing research, shot lists, storyboards, and the like during prep. Some directors I&#8217;ve worked with have refused to do shot lists because they don&#8217;t want to be &#8220;locked in&#8221; to doing those particular shots on the day of shooting. This is silly because a good producer and crew understands the importance of being flexible on set and allowing for the organic nature of filmmaking to take its course, and would not pressure a director to stick strictly to his or her shot list. On the contrary, a shot list is what allows a director the freedom to improvise on the shoot day. Going into production without a shooting plan is very dangerous because it could easily throw the entire schedule (and consequently, the budget) off the rails.</p>
<p><strong>7. Solid Work Ethic &amp; High Stamina</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>Making a movie is hands down the hardest work I&#8217;ve ever done. That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m so picky with my projects. I cannot imagine working so hard on something I don&#8217;t care about. So when I take on a project, I expect to work very hard on it, and I expect no less of my director. Once, during late-stage prep on a film, the director kept checking into bars and restaurants on Foursquare, and tweeting about how much fun he was having hanging out with his friends. I did not like this one bit. If I and your crew are working our asses off on your film, then you should be too. Indie directors must have a very solid work ethic, and a high stamina for long hours spent doing what will likely be the most intellectually, physically, and emotionally challenging work they&#8217;ve ever done.</p>
<p><strong>8. Vast Knowledge of Film</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>It&#8217;s important for all directors to know the language of cinema. By knowing what&#8217;s been done before and what certain shots have traditionally communicated, a director doesn&#8217;t have to reinvent the wheel. He or she can then more easily pay homage to, do variations on, or reject conventions. Being able to refer to certain films, scenes, or shots also makes it much easier and quicker for a director to articulate his vision to the crew and cast.</p>
<p><strong>9. Articulate</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>In all productions, but especially indie ones, a director often has to defend the creative decisions that conflict with budget or schedule limitations. As such, a director should be able to clearly articulate why he needs 5 picture cars instead of 2, or 21 shoot days instead of 20, or a Steadicam instead of doing it handheld. A good producer will listen and OK the expenditures if the director provides a strong rationale for them. Of course, it&#8217;s also beneficial when directors can clearly and efficiently communicate what they want to their actors and crew, and woo financiers with a pitch. Directors should practice untangling the creative jumble in their heads to form coherent thoughts and actionable requests (that, or find a producer who can translate for them).</p>
<p><strong>10. Publicity-Friendly</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>Being articulate also helps when a director is promoting a film. Communicating your vision to the media and the public can be a difficult thing to do, especially if you can&#8217;t afford fancy publicists to guide you. Some directors I&#8217;ve worked with are great at making movies, but can&#8217;t write loglines or synopses, pitch their own films, or conduct coherent Q&amp;As, so I&#8217;ll have to pinch hit. But it&#8217;s really nice when they can do these things, because no one cares about the producer! Distributors also expect directors to play an active role in film promotion, especially now that the landscape is so difficult, and so much rides on the cult of personality. Bonus points for the director who is active in social media. There is no substitute for authenticity, and when a director can tweet in his or her own voice, it generates a lot more interest and engagement.</p>
<p><strong>11. Technically Adept</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>Knowing how to use Twitter and Facebook is part and parcel of the overall technical aptitude that&#8217;s important for an indie director to have. Indie directors and producers often have to be jacks of all trades&#8211;more so than ever now that so much of marketing and distribution falls on our shoulders. When you can&#8217;t pay your Web designer, graphic artist, or assistant editor enough to be on call (or when you can&#8217;t afford these folks in the first place), you should be prepared to do the job yourself. So if you have some spare time, learn how to use video editing, photo editing, illustration, and web design programs, and of course, social media tools. You should also try to stay abreast of the latest camera and post-production technologies because in indie land, post supervision often falls to you and your producer.</p>
<p><strong>12. Appreciative</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>Directors can be spoiled, bratty, entitled people. There is no place for that in the low-budget world, where everyone is working very long hours at very reduced rates. Directors who consistently show appreciation and respect for their cast and crew effectively motivate them, and that motivation is necessary fuel for low-budget productions. The director&#8211;not the producers or the actors&#8211;is the one who ultimately sets the tone of the production. If he or she is an unappreciative jerk, then everyone is miserable and left to wonder what all the suffering is for. An appreciative director also shares the limelight, and gives credit where it is due. And if/when Hollywood comes a-callin&#8217;, an appreciative director will remember the &#8220;little people&#8221; and &#8220;give back&#8221; by continuing to work with those who believed in his or her vision before anyone else did.</p>
<p>So there you have it! If you don&#8217;t possess most of these traits, please don&#8217;t call me&#8211;unless you are David Fincher or Terrence Malick. Actually&#8230;no, never mind, not even then. I will just enjoy your brilliant films from afar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ifp.org/resources/12-key-traits-of-the-indie-friendly-director/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 3/11 queries in 2.316 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 495/505 objects using disk: basic

 Served from: www.ifp.org @ 2013-02-16 19:52:25 by W3 Total Cache --